DPR – 2006-2007 – Section 1-8
2006-2007 - NRTEE Departmental Performance Report Previous - Table of Content - Next1.8 Summary of Performance Results by Indicator
Figure 2-Summary of performance results-Fiscal Year 2006-2007|
Expected Results and Outputs |
Performance Indicator |
Performance assessment |
Performance level |
|
High quality research |
Perceived quality |
Well perceived High quality analysis Comprehensive |
At target |
|
Effective consultations |
Extent of consultations |
Broad consultations on Long-term Energy and Climate Change Extensive expert consultation |
At target |
|
Effectiveness of consultations |
High added value Good process Involve small groups Online consultation well perceived |
||
|
Useful recommen-dations and advice |
Perceived usefulness, relevance and timeliness |
Useful and timely Relevant Risk of focusing too much on short term Sometimes overtaken by events Need to clarify research versus process role |
At target |
|
Perceived independence of NRTEE |
Some concern about long-term loss of independence given increased focus on federal government |
||
|
Demand for NRTEE advice |
Continuing requests from federal government Strong demand for briefings from federal department and national stakeholders Citations from stakeholders |
||
|
Effective communication of recommen-dations |
Reach of communications |
Extensive data base Increasing media coverage Steady increase in use of website Reach could be increased |
Approaching target |
|
Quality of communications |
Good mix of instruments Products are well perceived |
||
|
Increased awareness and understanding of issues and solutions |
Awareness of issues and solutions |
Limited impact on increasing awareness at federal level Unknown in case of national stakeholders |
Approaching target |
|
Understanding of issues and solutions |
Strong benefit in terms of greater understanding of issues |
© 2013